Re: ksh experts take a look please (tiny patch inside)

2009-11-23 Thread Philip Guenther
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Philip Guenther wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 9:21 PM, patrick keshishian > wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:15:17PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote: >>> I wonder if included patch is a correct fix for the following >>> "glitch" I'm seeing with ksh in `set

Re: ksh experts take a look please (tiny patch inside)

2009-11-23 Thread Janjaap van Velthooven
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 09:11:14PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 9:21 PM, patrick keshishian > wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:15:17PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote: > >> I wonder if included patch is a correct fix for the following > >> "glitch" I'm seeing with k

Re: ksh experts take a look please (tiny patch inside)

2009-11-22 Thread patrick keshishian
Hi Philip, On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 09:11:14PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 9:21 PM, patrick keshishian > wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:15:17PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote: > >> I wonder if included patch is a correct fix for the following > >> "glitch" I'm s

Re: ksh experts take a look please (tiny patch inside)

2009-11-22 Thread Anders Langworthy
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Philip Guenther wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 9:21 PM, patrick keshishian > wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:15:17PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote: >>> I wonder if included patch is a correct fix for the following >>> "glitch" I'm seeing with ksh in `set

Re: ksh experts take a look please (tiny patch inside)

2009-11-22 Thread Philip Guenther
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 9:21 PM, patrick keshishian wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:15:17PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote: >> I wonder if included patch is a correct fix for the following >> "glitch" I'm seeing with ksh in `set -o vi' mode: >> >> Demonstration of "glitch": >> $ touch a

Re: ksh experts take a look please (tiny patch inside)

2009-11-21 Thread patrick keshishian
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:15:17PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote: > I wonder if included patch is a correct fix for the following > "glitch" I'm seeing with ksh in `set -o vi' mode: > > Demonstration of "glitch": > $ touch a.c a.h > $ ls a. > ls: a.: No such file or directory >

ksh experts take a look please (tiny patch inside)

2009-11-21 Thread patrick keshishian
I wonder if included patch is a correct fix for the following "glitch" I'm seeing with ksh in `set -o vi' mode: Demonstration of "glitch": $ touch a.c a.h $ ls a. ls: a.: No such file or directory $ a.c a.h $ With patch: $ ls a.