On 19 Oct 08:49, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 05:16:27PM +0200, Uwe Werler wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'm just wondering why there's a test for an empty line and args to start
> > the
> > editor for line editing. In bash one can start vi immediately with an empty
> > line by
Hi Klemens,
On 19 Oct 08:49, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 05:16:27PM +0200, Uwe Werler wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'm just wondering why there's a test for an empty line and args to start
> > the
> > editor for line editing. In bash one can start vi immediately with an empty
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 05:16:27PM +0200, Uwe Werler wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm just wondering why there's a test for an empty line and args to start the
> editor for line editing. In bash one can start vi immediately with an empty
> line by ^v. Might be there's another reason I don't understand
On 31 Aug 17:16, Uwe Werler wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm just wondering why there's a test for an empty line and args to start the
> editor for line editing. In bash one can start vi immediately with an empty
> line by ^v. Might be there's another reason I don't understand for this test?
>
>
>
