regard to making ktrace
following symlinks again, however I don't quite understand what problems
may occur when doing so. May anyone enlighten me on this?
IMHO, it makes more sense to add fktrace(2) aka NetBSD where an open
fd is passed in.
To have a more generic interface?
Yes. ktra
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 09:50:25PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Klemens Nanni wrote:
>>>
>>> So I just wrapped my head around vfs(9) with regard to making ktrace
>
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 09:50:25PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Klemens Nanni wrote:
So I just wrapped my head around vfs(9) with regard to making ktrace
following symlinks again, however I don't quite understand what problems
may occur when doing so
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> So I just wrapped my head around vfs(9) with regard to making ktrace
> following symlinks again, however I don't quite understand what problems
> may occur when doing so. May anyone enlighten me on this?
IMHO, it makes mor
So I just wrapped my head around vfs(9) with regard to making ktrace
following symlinks again, however I don't quite understand what problems
may occur when doing so. May anyone enlighten me on this?
This feature was explicitly disabled 17 years ago[1] appearently because
FreeBSD did so[2]
