Hi Ingo,
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 12:27:39PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> uint32_t should be preferred because that's the POSIX type, while
> u_int32_t is not standardized. If you are working on the file
> anyway, i'd recommend to unify all uses to uint32_t.
done.
> __LP64__ that is overly
Thanks Ingo for your extensive review! It contains lots of valuable
input for me.
I have applied all your recommendations, they make a lot of sense.
> I would suggest to use uint32_t.
Just while applying this, I noticed that the file has a mix of the
types u_int32_t and uint32_t. I took
Hi,
this patch adds a lot of input validation to libc/locale/rune.c.
The kind of validations are borrowed from my nls changes some
weeks ago.
I've contacted stsp@ about this. I think it's ready to get more
review from tech@. Let me know what you think!
Tobias
Index: rune.c
