On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 09:49:24PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 14:22:33 -0400
> > From: George Koehler
> >
> > On Fri, 7 May 2021 10:31:55 +0200 (CEST)
> > Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >
> > > Makes sense to me. It seems ldd always seems to require a little bit
> > > more
> Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 14:22:33 -0400
> From: George Koehler
>
> On Fri, 7 May 2021 10:31:55 +0200 (CEST)
> Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> > Makes sense to me. It seems ldd always seems to require a little bit
> > more coercion to produce non-standard binaries. We use linker scripts
> > for the
On Fri, 7 May 2021 10:31:55 +0200 (CEST)
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Makes sense to me. It seems ldd always seems to require a little bit
> more coercion to produce non-standard binaries. We use linker scripts
> for the various EFI bootloaders as well.
>
> ok kettenis@
My diff had an extra "pwd"
> Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 00:04:57 -0400
> From: George Koehler
>
> Hello tech list,
>
> I want macppc to switch from ld.bfd to ld.lld, but there is a problem
> when lld links ofwboot or the kernel. I propose to fix it by adding
> ld.script for both. These scripts also work with ld.bfd, so I
Hello tech list,
I want macppc to switch from ld.bfd to ld.lld, but there is a problem
when lld links ofwboot or the kernel. I propose to fix it by adding
ld.script for both. These scripts also work with ld.bfd, so I want to
commit my diff at the end of this mail, ok?
lld sets the symbol
