On 2022/10/12 10:45:49 +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Anyone willing to OK either the previous NetBSD/FreeBSD sync diff or the
> following minimal one which just mentions missing types?
>
> We can always improve from there, but being stuck at an incomplete and
> thus misleading manual sucks.
agre
On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 10:09:27AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 05:19:55PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > Our make(1) is behind NetBSD's and FreeBSD's make(1) on at least the
> > rules of variable substitution.
> >
> > Our DESCRIPION says
> >
> > There are seven dif
On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 05:19:55PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Our make(1) is behind NetBSD's and FreeBSD's make(1) on at least the
> rules of variable substitution.
>
> Our DESCRIPION says
>
> There are seven different types of lines in a makefile: dependency lines,
> shell commands,
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 07:12:58PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> I do think we want to write something specific for .for loop variables
> which are actually very special compared to the rest.
>
> I'm not incredibly happy with the way netbsd explains it, not surprisingly.
Do you want to work on this i
I do think we want to write something specific for .for loop variables
which are actually very special compared to the rest.
I'm not incredibly happy with the way netbsd explains it, not surprisingly.
Our make(1) is behind NetBSD's and FreeBSD's make(1) on at least the
rules of variable substitution.
Our DESCRIPION says
There are seven different types of lines in a makefile: dependency lines,
shell commands, variable assignments, include statements, conditional
directives, for l