Re: massage volume control task

2015-01-18 Thread David Gwynne
On 17 Jan 2015, at 11:06, Jim Smith j...@insec.sh wrote: On 2 Jan 2015, at 4:15 pm, David Gwynne da...@gwynne.id.au wrote: can someone test this? it allocates storage for the volume change details rather than cast arguments to a single global task. adds some safety while there if

Re: massage volume control task

2015-01-16 Thread Jim Smith
On 2 Jan 2015, at 4:15 pm, David Gwynne da...@gwynne.id.au wrote: can someone test this? it allocates storage for the volume change details rather than cast arguments to a single global task. adds some safety while there if audio0 is a hotplug device. ok? The keyboard audio controls

Re: massage volume control task

2015-01-11 Thread David Gwynne
On 3 Jan 2015, at 9:35 am, David Gwynne da...@gwynne.id.au wrote: On 2 Jan 2015, at 9:55 pm, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote: Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 16:15:07 +1000 From: David Gwynne da...@gwynne.id.au can someone test this? it allocates storage for the volume change

Re: massage volume control task

2015-01-02 Thread Mark Kettenis
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 16:15:07 +1000 From: David Gwynne da...@gwynne.id.au can someone test this? it allocates storage for the volume change details rather than cast arguments to a single global task. adds some safety while there if audio0 is a hotplug device. ok? The problem with

Re: massage volume control task

2015-01-02 Thread David Gwynne
On 2 Jan 2015, at 9:55 pm, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote: Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 16:15:07 +1000 From: David Gwynne da...@gwynne.id.au can someone test this? it allocates storage for the volume change details rather than cast arguments to a single global task. adds some

massage volume control task

2015-01-01 Thread David Gwynne
can someone test this? it allocates storage for the volume change details rather than cast arguments to a single global task. adds some safety while there if audio0 is a hotplug device. ok? Index: audio.c === RCS file: