On 08/12/21(Wed) 22:39, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 03:28:34PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 04/12/21(Sat) 01:02, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > As I want a read-only net lock for forwarding, all paths should be
> > > checked for the correct net lock and
On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 03:28:34PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 04/12/21(Sat) 01:02, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As I want a read-only net lock for forwarding, all paths should be
> > checked for the correct net lock and asserts. I found code in
> > in_pcbhashlookup() where
On 04/12/21(Sat) 01:02, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I want a read-only net lock for forwarding, all paths should be
> checked for the correct net lock and asserts. I found code in
> in_pcbhashlookup() where reading the PCB table results in a write
> to optimize the cache.
>
> Porperly
Hi,
As I want a read-only net lock for forwarding, all paths should be
checked for the correct net lock and asserts. I found code in
in_pcbhashlookup() where reading the PCB table results in a write
to optimize the cache.
Porperly protecting PCB hashes is out of scope for parallel forwarding.
