On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 02:52:02AM +0100, Tony Sidaway wrote:
On 13/07/2013, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
Whoa. I think USB was just called a good model.
Good? I'm not sure on that point. A better idea for a model? Yeah,
kind of like much less worse.
I'll readily
Making it better requires a bigger effort. However, ones you get part
way along the line you might see oh, lower level abstration good.
If you get to that point, and make the next steps forward, you'll be a
hero.
Thanks. I've received several helpful comments and contributions from
On 13/07/2013, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
Whoa. I think USB was just called a good model.
Good? I'm not sure on that point. A better idea for a model? Yeah,
kind of like much less worse.
I'll readily study any better model. But let's be realistic. I've
already started
I'm working on the netbt and /dev/bluetooth code, which is currently
broken and has been disabled in the generic kernel for over a year
now.
I'm not an experienced BSD developer (yet) so I'm using this code as a
way of learning how to debug and fix major problems. I'm also working
on updating the
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 21:46, Tony Sidaway wrote:
So hi, and if there's anybody else looking at this code, please get in
touch. I hope I'll be able to fix the problems of the device sleeping
in mutexed code. If there is a high likelihood that this code will
soon be removed from the tree,
So hi, and if there's anybody else looking at this code, please get in
touch. I hope I'll be able to fix the problems of the device sleeping
in mutexed code. If there is a high likelihood that this code will
soon be removed from the tree, that would be nice to know too. Maybe I
could
