On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 05:36:48PM -0700, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> I like it, some comments in-line but overall I think this would have
> helped me get started with siteXX stuff, so OK afresh1@
Great, I'll commit with tweaks as per below, thanks!
> > +If existent and executable,
>
> This whol
I like it, some comments in-line but overall I think this would have
helped me get started with siteXX stuff, so OK afresh1@
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 03:19:03PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 07:35:28PM -0500, Aaron Poffenberger wrote:
> > Looks good. Nice to see this moving
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 07:35:28PM -0500, Aaron Poffenberger wrote:
> Looks good. Nice to see this moving forward. Thanks.
>
> On 2021-10-27 21:13 +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 02:29:50PM -0500, Aaron Poffenberger wrote:
> > > Ping.
> > >
> > > Will someone commit this?
Looks good. Nice to see this moving forward. Thanks.
On 2021-10-27 21:13 +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 02:29:50PM -0500, Aaron Poffenberger wrote:
> > Ping.
> >
> > Will someone commit this? Seems like no one knows about /upgrade.site and it
> > fits well with sysupgrade(
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 02:29:50PM -0500, Aaron Poffenberger wrote:
> Ping.
>
> Will someone commit this? Seems like no one knows about /upgrade.site and it
> fits well with sysupgrade(8).
sysupgrade(8) is one potential /upgrade.site user but I disagree about
documenting the latter through the fo
