hmm, on Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:42:39AM -0400, Nick Holland said that
On 09/06/13 04:50, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/09/05 20:03, Barry Grumbine wrote:
Non-VM use case: The BeagleBone Black has no RTC, so -j could be
useful for cheap little ARM development boards.
-s is fine for
On 2013/09/05 20:03, Barry Grumbine wrote:
Non-VM use case: The BeagleBone Black has no RTC, so -j could be
useful for cheap little ARM development boards.
-s is fine for that (and the same for those of the alix boards with
no rtc battery, etc).
On 09/06/13 04:50, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/09/05 20:03, Barry Grumbine wrote:
Non-VM use case: The BeagleBone Black has no RTC, so -j could be
useful for cheap little ARM development boards.
-s is fine for that (and the same for those of the alix boards with
no rtc battery, etc).
On 2013/09/06 07:42, Nick Holland wrote:
On 09/06/13 04:50, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/09/05 20:03, Barry Grumbine wrote:
Non-VM use case: The BeagleBone Black has no RTC, so -j could be
useful for cheap little ARM development boards.
-s is fine for that (and the same for those of
I think I had a script on my previous laptop to see if ifconfig egress
would result in something, and only wait for ntp to sync time in those
cases.
The existance of a default route may not be 100% fool-proof, but on
dhcp-boxes it was good-enough for me.
2013/9/6 Stuart Henderson
Non-VM use case: The BeagleBone Black has no RTC, so -j could be
useful for cheap little ARM development boards.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Reyk Floeter r...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 08:45:25AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
Bah. I tend to turn ntpd off and rely on the
Il giorno Domenica, 11 Agosto, 2013 22:47 CEST, Ted Unangst
t...@tedunangst.com ha scritto:
Nobody seemed to much care about my previous effort to get OpenBSD to
play nicely inside a suspended VM.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=134324835209706w=2
Instead of the kernel, this time I'm
Hi!
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 04:47:08PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
Nobody seemed to much care about my previous effort to get OpenBSD to
play nicely inside a suspended VM.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=134324835209706w=2
Well, I do care about VMs!
Instead of the kernel, this time I'm
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 02:28:00PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
Bah. I tend to turn ntpd off and rely on the internal clock
synchronization of the hypervisor. But fixing ntpd inside VMs would
probably be a big win.
the guest drivers in OpenBSD don't provide a time sensor based on the
host
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 14:28, Reyk Floeter wrote:
Bah. I tend to turn ntpd off and rely on the internal clock
synchronization of the hypervisor. But fixing ntpd inside VMs would
probably be a big win.
Can you explain what you do? I have a vmt timedelta sensor that shows
host time, but how
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 02:39:16PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 02:28:00PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
Bah. I tend to turn ntpd off and rely on the internal clock
synchronization of the hypervisor. But fixing ntpd inside VMs would
probably be a big win.
the
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 08:45:25AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
Bah. I tend to turn ntpd off and rely on the internal clock
synchronization of the hypervisor. But fixing ntpd inside VMs would
probably be a big win.
Can you explain what you do? I have a vmt timedelta sensor that shows
host
12 matches
Mail list logo