On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 07:59:51PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> I got a positive test report from Paul de Weerd.
>
> Anyone to ok it?
OK claudio@
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 01:06:49PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > While hunting a bug in ntpd offset handling, I found some
I got a positive test report from Paul de Weerd.
Anyone to ok it?
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 01:06:49PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While hunting a bug in ntpd offset handling, I found some things
> that could be improved.
>
> Call the index of the offset loops "shift" consistently.
>
Hi,
While hunting a bug in ntpd offset handling, I found some things
that could be improved.
Call the index of the offset loops "shift" consistently.
Merge the two offset loops in client_update() into one.
Assign the best value instead of memcpy.
Use the same mechanism everywhere to avoid an