Re: ofw/fdt: obstacle on pretty dev/fdt/X_fdt.c attachment glue for the common (ie. i2c) drivers

2018-05-04 Thread Artturi Alm
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 08:08:15PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 20:56:07 +0300 > > From: Artturi Alm > > > > Hi, > > > > currently, I don't see how it is possible to write generic > > i2c-parent-controller-independent attachment glue in dev/fdt/, > > ie. for drivers in d

Re: ofw/fdt: obstacle on pretty dev/fdt/X_fdt.c attachment glue for the common (ie. i2c) drivers

2018-05-04 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 20:56:07 +0300 > From: Artturi Alm > > Hi, > > currently, I don't see how it is possible to write generic > i2c-parent-controller-independent attachment glue in dev/fdt/, > ie. for drivers in dev/i2c. The usual way how they are written with > doesn't work as the devices i

ofw/fdt: obstacle on pretty dev/fdt/X_fdt.c attachment glue for the common (ie. i2c) drivers

2018-05-04 Thread Artturi Alm
Hi, currently, I don't see how it is possible to write generic i2c-parent-controller-independent attachment glue in dev/fdt/, ie. for drivers in dev/i2c. The usual way how they are written with doesn't work as the devices in dev/i2c attach "at i2c" already. visa@ just commited something in the d