On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 05:46:29PM +0200, Sven Wolf wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> thanks for your effort.
> I've successfully tested your latest patch.
> I also got the sw_hw_rev:
>
> sc_hw_rev=354
Thank you! Now everything makes sense :)
Hi Stefan,
thanks for your effort.
I've successfully tested your latest patch.
I also got the sw_hw_rev:
sc_hw_rev=354
Thanks,
Sven
On 4/9/22 17:11, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 04:53:50PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 04:52:12PM +0200, Stefan Sperl
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 04:53:50PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 04:52:12PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 04:29:42PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > As sthen points out, please show sc_hw_rev without any of its bits
> > > masked out, with a
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 04:52:12PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 04:29:42PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > As sthen points out, please show sc_hw_rev without any of its bits
> > masked out, with a patch like this:
>
> Nevermind, I found a bug in my patch which most cer
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 04:29:42PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> As sthen points out, please show sc_hw_rev without any of its bits
> masked out, with a patch like this:
Nevermind, I found a bug in my patch which most certainly
breaks your device.
Please try this on top of the patch I sent out,
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 03:28:14PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 12:47:56PM +0200, Sven Wolf wrote:
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > sorry, I'm not sure how I can get the sc_hw_rev value.
> > Hopefully this is the requested value:
> >
> > iwx0: hw rev 0x350, fw ver 67.8f59b80b.0
>
On 4/9/22 15:28, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 12:47:56PM +0200, Sven Wolf wrote:
Hi Stefan,
sorry, I'm not sure how I can get the sc_hw_rev value.
Hopefully this is the requested value:
iwx0: hw rev 0x350, fw ver 67.8f59b80b.0
This is not the "QuZ" (0x354) hardware revis
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 12:47:56PM +0200, Sven Wolf wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> sorry, I'm not sure how I can get the sc_hw_rev value.
> Hopefully this is the requested value:
>
> iwx0: hw rev 0x350, fw ver 67.8f59b80b.0
This is not the "QuZ" (0x354) hardware revision.
However, Linux obviously load
On 2022/04/09 12:47, Sven Wolf wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> sorry, I'm not sure how I can get the sc_hw_rev value.
> Hopefully this is the requested value:
>
> iwx0: hw rev 0x350, fw ver 67.8f59b80b.0
hw rev in this line is masked (sc->sc_hw_rev & IWX_CSR_HW_REV_TYPE_MSK
which is 0x000FFF0), the IWX_
Hi Stefan,
sorry, I'm not sure how I can get the sc_hw_rev value.
Hopefully this is the requested value:
iwx0: hw rev 0x350, fw ver 67.8f59b80b.0
Best regards,
Sven
On 4/9/22 11:35, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 12:31:09AM +0200, Sven Wolf wrote:
Hi Stefan,
on my device WL_
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 12:31:09AM +0200, Sven Wolf wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> on my device WL_22500_8 0x4df0 this patch doesn't work directly.
> I get the error message:
> iwx0: could not load firmware, 35
> iwx0: failed to load init firmware
>
> Under Linux the firmware iwlwifi-QuZ-a0-hr-b0-
Hi Stefan,
on my device WL_22500_8 0x4df0 this patch doesn't work directly.
I get the error message:
iwx0: could not load firmware, 35
iwx0: failed to load init firmware
Under Linux the firmware iwlwifi-QuZ-a0-hr-b0-67.ucode is loaded for
this device. Also my old patch
(https://marc.info/?l=op
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 10:33:39PM +, Iraklis Karagkiozoglou wrote:
> Hello Stefan,
>
> I tried to port the firmware detection and config values
> from iwlwifi.
>
> On iwx_cfg_trans_params and iwx_cfg structs I ported only
> the fields iwx_attach was setting based on the iwx_device.
>
> With
Hello Stefan,
I tried to port the firmware detection and config values
from iwlwifi.
On iwx_cfg_trans_params and iwx_cfg structs I ported only
the fields iwx_attach was setting based on the iwx_device.
With best regards,
Iraklis Karagkiozoglou
diff --git sys/dev/pci/if_iwx.c sys/dev/pci/if_iwx.
On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 05:32:21PM +, Iraklis Karagkiozoglou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've added support for AX201 with subsystem id 0x0030 in if_iwx.
>
> I am only loading a different firmware for the specific subsystem id to
> avoid introducing any regressions or bugs.
We are receiving more and mo
Hi,
I've added support for AX201 with subsystem id 0x0030 in if_iwx.
I am only loading a different firmware for the specific subsystem id to
avoid introducing any regressions or bugs.
--
Iraklis Karagkiozoglou
diff --git sys/dev/pci/if_iwx.c sys/dev/pci/if_iwx.c
index 4c85ad108a8..78b73303f42 1
16 matches
Mail list logo