On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:55:07AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> > This probably saw some debate in the past, which I did not see. On my IRC
> > channel it is concensus that the path given out is dangerous.
>
> Why? They whole point of putting home f
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> This probably saw some debate in the past, which I did not see. On my IRC
> channel it is concensus that the path given out is dangerous.
Why? They whole point of putting home first is so you can override
system software. If there are dangerous bi
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 05:08:32PM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> This probably saw some debate in the past, which I did not see. On my IRC
> channel it is concensus that the path given out is dangerous.
I'd like to retract this patch. I lied. Yes I told a lie. Danger talking or
discussing a
This probably saw some debate in the past, which I did not see. On my IRC
channel it is concensus that the path given out is dangerous.
-peter
Index: dot.profile
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/etc/skel/dot.profile,v
retrieving revision 1.4