Hello,
On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 23:30:56 +0200
Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> I'm OK with your change.
Thank you for your review and comment.
> However I would like to ask you to do yet another test. I wonder if things
> will eventually work on unfixed PF if rules will be constructed as follows:
>
>
Hello Yasuoka,
I'm OK with your change.
However I would like to ask you to do yet another test. I wonder if things
will eventually work on unfixed PF if rules will be constructed as follows:
pfctl -a test -t LB -T add 10.0.0.11@pair102
echo 'pass in on rdomain 102 quick proto tcp to
Hi,
pf.conf:
anchor {
pass in on rdomain 102 quick proto tcp to 10.0.0.101 port 8080 \
keep state ( sloppy ) route-to \
least-states sticky-address
}
table {
10.0.0.11@pair102
}
this doesn't work. All packets going to 10.0.0.101 are dropped with
'no-route'. The
