On 7 March 2017 at 02:32, David Gwynne wrote:
>
>> On 2 Mar 2017, at 21:19, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:11 +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>>> On 02/03/17(Thu) 01:16, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On 2 March 2017 at 00:56, David
> On 2 Mar 2017, at 21:19, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:11 +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> On 02/03/17(Thu) 01:16, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>>> On 2 March 2017 at 00:56, David Gwynne wrote:
> On 2 Mar 2017, at 06:43, Mike
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 12:19:44PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> Here's an updated diff with suggestions from bluhm@ and it's
> even slimmer now but I don't mind either way. If David isn't
> comfortable with this change, we don't have to do it.
OK bluhm@
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:11 +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 02/03/17(Thu) 01:16, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > On 2 March 2017 at 00:56, David Gwynne wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 2 Mar 2017, at 06:43, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > >>
> > >> This convers hand rolled
On 02/03/17(Thu) 01:16, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 2 March 2017 at 00:56, David Gwynne wrote:
> >
> >> On 2 Mar 2017, at 06:43, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> >>
> >> This convers hand rolled lists into exactly the same mbuf_lists.
> >> I need this because of the
On 2 March 2017 at 00:56, David Gwynne wrote:
>
>> On 2 Mar 2017, at 06:43, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>>
>> This convers hand rolled lists into exactly the same mbuf_lists.
>> I need this because of the next diff that uses the ml_len packet
>> counter that
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:43:16PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> This convers hand rolled lists into exactly the same mbuf_lists.
> I need this because of the next diff that uses the ml_len packet
> counter that mbuf_lists have. Otherwise there's no functional
> change.
> void *
>
This convers hand rolled lists into exactly the same mbuf_lists.
I need this because of the next diff that uses the ml_len packet
counter that mbuf_lists have. Otherwise there's no functional
change.
---
sys/net/ifq.c | 48 ++--
1 file changed, 18