If you're currently using procfs, please respond with exactly what parts of
it are actually needed by the programs you run. Without a good reason to
keep it, it'll be deleted, as I broke listing of /proc back in January and
no one has noticed, suggesting that no one is actually using it...
I suspect procfs is only enabled on i386 because that's the only arch
with compat_linux support? If so, anyone who relies on compat_linux
support should be sure to test and report back if they have problems.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
If you're
I do use it occasionally, and I don't run -current so I wouldn't have noticed
any breakage yet.
I don't rely on it, however, it's a convenience feature that I very
occasionally use, and only manually when I do.
I can live without it if it dies; it was never a fully-featured implementation
IMHO
