Re: proctreelk

2019-03-08 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 20/03/18(Tue) 18:24, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 26/02/18(Mon) 17:52, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > On 20/10/17(Fri) 11:50, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > > On 14/10/17(Sat) 22:07, Philip Guenther wrote: > > > > > > > > The diff below adds

Re: proctreelk

2018-03-20 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 26/02/18(Mon) 17:52, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 20/10/17(Fri) 11:50, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > On 14/10/17(Sat) 22:07, Philip Guenther wrote: > > > > > > The diff below adds proctreelk, an rwlock protecting the links of the > > > process tree an

Re: proctreelk

2018-02-26 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 20/10/17(Fri) 11:50, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 14/10/17(Sat) 22:07, Philip Guenther wrote: > > > > The diff below adds proctreelk, an rwlock protecting the links of the > > process tree and related bits, as well as uidinfolk, an rwlock protecting > > the uidinfo

Re: proctreelk

2017-10-20 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 14/10/17(Sat) 22:07, Philip Guenther wrote: > > The diff below adds proctreelk, an rwlock protecting the links of the > process tree and related bits, as well as uidinfolk, an rwlock protecting > the uidinfo hash table. > > Parts of this are based on FreeBSD's proctree_

proctreelk

2017-10-14 Thread Philip Guenther
The diff below adds proctreelk, an rwlock protecting the links of the process tree and related bits, as well as uidinfolk, an rwlock protecting the uidinfo hash table. Parts of this are based on FreeBSD's proctree_lock, particularly the reorganization of enterpgrp() into enternewpgrp