Re: properly name raid volumes on mpii

2011-02-24 Thread David Gwynne
On 24/02/2011, at 5:33 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: Hmm, this looks like a fix for PR 6269, although that report is for mpi(4). Any chance a similar fix works for mpi(4)? thats a fairly old PR. is anyone able to reproduce it on mpi(4) with a modern kernel? dlg

Re: properly name raid volumes on mpii

2011-02-24 Thread David Gwynne
On 24/02/2011, at 6:51 PM, David Gwynne wrote: On 24/02/2011, at 5:33 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: Hmm, this looks like a fix for PR 6269, although that report is for mpi(4). Any chance a similar fix works for mpi(4)? thats a fairly old PR. is anyone able to reproduce it on mpi(4) with a

Re: properly name raid volumes on mpii

2011-02-24 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:42 +1000, David Gwynne wrote: you want to look up disks attached to an mpi by bus addressing, not which raid volume you happen to be up to. before this diff i got: dlg@hotspare dlg$ sudo bioctl mpii0 Volume Status Size Device mpii0 0 Online

Re: properly name raid volumes on mpii

2011-02-23 Thread Mark Kettenis
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:42:51 +1000 From: David Gwynne l...@animata.net you want to look up disks attached to an mpi by bus addressing, not which raid volume you happen to be up to. before this diff i got: dlg@hotspare dlg$ sudo bioctl mpii0 Volume Status Size Device