Re: qemu-old .. relevent or not?

2011-03-21 Thread Stanley Lieber
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Brad wrote: > On 22/03/11 4:54 PM, Stanley Lieber wrote: >>> >>> I've gotten one request to decommission qemu-old. B It surprised me, >>> as I thought there were still issues with qemu/ even with the semi recent >>> thread fix as well as performance differences. >>

Re: qemu-old .. relevent or not?

2011-03-21 Thread Brad
On 21/03/11 7:08 PM, Stanley Lieber wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Brad wrote: On 22/03/11 4:54 PM, Stanley Lieber wrote: I've gotten one request to decommission qemu-old. It surprised me, as I thought there were still issues with qemu/ even with the semi recent thread fix as well a

Re: qemu-old .. relevent or not?

2011-03-21 Thread Brad
On 22/03/11 4:54 PM, Stanley Lieber wrote: I've gotten one request to decommission qemu-old. It surprised me, as I thought there were still issues with qemu/ even with the semi recent thread fix as well as performance differences. Does anybody have objection to retiring qemu-old to the attic or

Re: qemu-old .. relevent or not?

2011-03-21 Thread Brad
On 21/03/11 5:59 PM, Henning Brauer wrote: * Todd T. Fries [2011-03-21 22:01]: Does anybody have objection to retiring qemu-old to the attic or ? yes, I object for the time being. the laptops where i use(d) qemu most are stuck in tokyo, hadn't had a chance to try the recently updated 0.14 ye

Re: qemu-old .. relevent or not?

2011-03-21 Thread Todd T. Fries
I withdraw any thoughts of removing qemu-old anytime soon based on feedback. Henning confirms performance gains for keeping it. And we have a reminder that while kqemu is not recommended, it is only usable on qemu-old. Penned by Todd T. Fries on 20110321 15:58.35, we have: | I've gotten one requ

Re: qemu-old .. relevent or not?

2011-03-21 Thread Henning Brauer
* Todd T. Fries [2011-03-21 22:01]: > Does anybody have objection to retiring qemu-old to the attic or ? yes, I object for the time being. the laptops where i use(d) qemu most are stuck in tokyo, hadn't had a chance to try the recently updated 0.14 yet and due to this situation it'll be a bit, b

Re: qemu-old .. relevent or not?

2011-03-21 Thread Stanley Lieber
> I've gotten one request to decommission qemu-old. It surprised me, > as I thought there were still issues with qemu/ even with the semi recent > thread fix as well as performance differences. > > Does anybody have objection to retiring qemu-old to the attic or ? > > I'd rather not do this prem

qemu-old .. relevent or not?

2011-03-21 Thread Todd T. Fries
I've gotten one request to decommission qemu-old. It surprised me, as I thought there were still issues with qemu/ even with the semi recent thread fix as well as performance differences. Does anybody have objection to retiring qemu-old to the attic or ? I'd rather not do this prematurely but if