Hi,
On Monday, December 5, 2011 10:53 CET, "Sebastian Reitenbach"
wrote:
> On Sunday, December 4, 2011 21:01 CET, Mark Kettenis
> wrote:
>
> > > Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:10:56 +0100
> > > From: Claudio Jeker
> > >
> > > On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 01:35:33PM +0100, Sebastian Reitenbach wro
* Geoff Steckel [2011-12-05 16:32]:
> On 12/05/2011 05:25 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> >On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:53:00 +0100
> >"Sebastian Reitenbach" wrote:
> >
> >>So to be able to shoot myself in the foot without the need to compile the
> >>kernel, I'll look into adding a sysctl to tweak the maxi
On 12/05/2011 05:25 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:53:00 +0100
"Sebastian Reitenbach" wrote:
So to be able to shoot myself in the foot without the need to compile the
kernel, I'll look into adding a sysctl to tweak the maximum size of the buffer.
Well, depending on time and
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 10:25:14AM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:53:00 +0100
> "Sebastian Reitenbach" wrote:
>
> > So to be able to shoot myself in the foot without the need to compile the
> > kernel, I'll look into adding a sysctl to tweak the maximum size of the
> > buf
* Mark Kettenis [2011-12-04 21:02]:
> But 256k simply isn't enough for some use cases. Turning this into a
> sysctl tunable like FreeBSD and NetBSD would be a good idea if you ask
> me. Yes, people will use it to shoot themselves in the foot. I don't
> care.
I agree.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:53:00 +0100
"Sebastian Reitenbach" wrote:
> So to be able to shoot myself in the foot without the need to compile the
> kernel, I'll look into adding a sysctl to tweak the maximum size of the
> buffer. Well, depending on time and how fast I figure out how to do that,
> mi
On Sunday, December 4, 2011 21:01 CET, Mark Kettenis
wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:10:56 +0100
> > From: Claudio Jeker
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 01:35:33PM +0100, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > > On Sunday, December 4, 2011 13:24 CET, Camiel Dobbelaar
> > > wrote:
> > >
> >
> Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:10:56 +0100
> From: Claudio Jeker
>
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 01:35:33PM +0100, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > On Sunday, December 4, 2011 13:24 CET, Camiel Dobbelaar
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 4-12-2011 13:01, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > > > the default maximum
* Geoff Steckel [2011-12-04 16:17]:
> To generalize this problem: kernel memory is limited. It is
> autosized at boot time.
that might have been true a decade ago, but not today.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP
Secure Hostin
On 12/04/2011 09:10 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 01:35:33PM +0100, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
On Sunday, December 4, 2011 13:24 CET, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
On 4-12-2011 13:01, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
the default maximum size of the tcp send and receive buffer used b
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 01:35:33PM +0100, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> On Sunday, December 4, 2011 13:24 CET, Camiel Dobbelaar
> wrote:
>
> > On 4-12-2011 13:01, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > > the default maximum size of the tcp send and receive buffer used by the
> > > autosizing algorit
On Sunday, December 4, 2011 13:24 CET, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
> On 4-12-2011 13:01, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > the default maximum size of the tcp send and receive buffer used by the
> > autosizing algorithm is way too small, when trying to get maximum speed
> > with high bandwidth and
On 4-12-2011 13:01, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> the default maximum size of the tcp send and receive buffer used by the
> autosizing algorithm is way too small, when trying to get maximum speed with
> high bandwidth and high latency connections.
I have tweaked SB_MAX on a system too, but it wa
Hi,
the default maximum size of the tcp send and receive buffer used by the
autosizing algorithm is way too small, when trying to get maximum speed with
high bandwidth and high latency connections.
I tested to get the best speed with a connection between Germany and Canada,
ping times around 1
14 matches
Mail list logo