include the optimized putchar functions only if RASOPS_SMALL
> > > is not defined.
> > >
> >
> > True that. In one #endif comment he actually kept the !, but the actual
> > ifs lost it.
>
> Here is a diff to fix the issue, which includes the optimized putchar
>
actual
> ifs lost it.
Here is a diff to fix the issue, which includes the optimized putchar
functions only if RASOPS_SMALL is not defined.
Comments? OK?
Index: sys/dev/rasops/rasops1.c
===========
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/rasops/ras
Am Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 11:32:58PM +0100 schrieb Frederic Cambus:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 10:33:52PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> > The diff below disables the optimized functions on little-endian
> > architectures such that we always use rasops1_putchar(). This makes
> >
Hi Mark,
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 10:33:52PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The diff below disables the optimized functions on little-endian
> architectures such that we always use rasops1_putchar(). This makes
> ssdfb(4) work with the default 8x16 font on arm64.
I noticed it was committed
the optimized functions on little-endian
architectures such that we always use rasops1_putchar(). This makes
ssdfb(4) work with the default 8x16 font on arm64.
ok?
Index: dev/rasops/rasops1.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/rasops
