Re: re(4): tedu some unused code

2013-12-31 Thread Chris Cappuccio
Brad Smith [b...@comstyle.com] wrote: tedu some unused code. it has never been enabled and will not be; to deal with a hardware defect for rare boards. unmaintained, untested, etc. want to get rid of it. Comments? OK? If RE_DIAG wasn't being compiled in, then it should be removed. The

Re: re(4): tedu some unused code

2013-12-31 Thread Brad Smith
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 09:55:54AM -0800, Chris Cappuccio wrote: Brad Smith [b...@comstyle.com] wrote: tedu some unused code. it has never been enabled and will not be; to deal with a hardware defect for rare boards. unmaintained, untested, etc. want to get rid of it. Comments? OK?

re(4): tedu some unused code

2013-12-30 Thread Brad Smith
tedu some unused code. it has never been enabled and will not be; to deal with a hardware defect for rare boards. unmaintained, untested, etc. want to get rid of it. Comments? OK? Index: re.c === RCS file: