On Feb 19 10:01:22, j...@insec.sh wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:23:15AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > it looks like it reads the DCSR register and then keeps everything
> > except the MPS field.
> >
> > this might cause it to erronously consider the mps to be much bigger
> > than 2048, whic
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:23:15AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> it looks like it reads the DCSR register and then keeps everything
> except the MPS field.
>
> this might cause it to erronously consider the mps to be much bigger
> than 2048, which in turn could prevent it from setting it correctly.
it looks like it reads the DCSR register and then keeps everything
except the MPS field.
this might cause it to erronously consider the mps to be much bigger
than 2048, which in turn could prevent it from setting it correctly.
i dont actually have one of these chips. can someone give it a spin?
