Hello,
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 02:19:24PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>
>
> > On 14 Jun 2021, at 19:12, Alexandr Nedvedicky
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > looks good to me. I think this should be committed
> > as-is. I have just one question,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 01:58:06PM
> On 14 Jun 2021, at 19:12, Alexandr Nedvedicky
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> looks good to me. I think this should be committed
> as-is. I have just one question,
>
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 01:58:06PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>
>> @@ -1931,6 +1933,9 @@ pfsync_defer(struct pf_state *st,
Hello,
looks good to me. I think this should be committed
as-is. I have just one question,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 01:58:06PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> @@ -1931,6 +1933,9 @@ pfsync_defer(struct pf_state *st, struct
> {
> struct pfsync_softc *sc = pfsyncif;
> struct
pfsync deferrals are used so if you have firewalls that could both
process packets, you defer sending the initial packet in state so the
peer can learn about the state before potentially handling packets for
it.
there are three ways that a deferal can end. the preferred one is if a
peer firewall
