On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 06:35:47PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 04:42:45PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > No but you push this layer into a specifc direction and by that make it
> > harder to fix the PCB tables in a different way. I just see people
> > changing the
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 04:42:45PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> No but you push this layer into a specifc direction and by that make it
> harder to fix the PCB tables in a different way. I just see people
> changing the NET_ASSERT_WLOCKED() without realizing the actual reason for
> the exclusive
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 02:56:43PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 02:25:08PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 02:09:51PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > syzkaller and witness found the same bug I introduced in UDP also
> > > for
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 02:25:08PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 02:09:51PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > syzkaller and witness found the same bug I introduced in UDP also
> > for Raw IP. Fix it the same was for rip and rip6.
> >
> >
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 02:09:51PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> syzkaller and witness found the same bug I introduced in UDP also
> for Raw IP. Fix it the same was for rip and rip6.
>
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9bac6356a881dc644265
>
Hi,
syzkaller and witness found the same bug I introduced in UDP also
for Raw IP. Fix it the same was for rip and rip6.
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9bac6356a881dc644265
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5b2679ee9be0895d26f9
ok?
bluhm
Index: netinet/raw_ip.c
