> > I considered "alias rm='rm -x'" in a profile, and planned to remember adding
> > -f when needed.
>
> If you're going to hack your profile already, you might as well just
> implement the logic there, so that it works on all the systems you
> carry that profile to instead of only those where rm
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Superingo wrote:
>> Your proposal is not going to solve your problem.
>> You are not trying to tell me that you plan to type 'rm -x'
>> for each and every removal in the future, right?
>> And even if you do plan on doing that, it's easy to forget.
>
> I considered
Hi Ingo,
thanks for the very quick reply. (Are you sure, you are not needlessly pissed,
because I used the "Superingo"-From? This was not meant to affect you or any
other real living being! So sorry, if misunderstood!)
> Hi Superingo,
>
> Superingo wrote on Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:19:45PM +02
Hi Superingo,
Superingo wrote on Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:19:45PM +0200:
> I just fatfingered a ';' into a ',':
>
> $ rm a.out, cc mind.c
>
> rm: a.out,: No such file or directory
> rm: cc: No such file or directory
>
> In full POSIX-conformance I lost my mind.
> Coincidentally I had an idea.
>
I just fatfingered a ';' into a ',':
$ rm a.out, cc mind.c
rm: a.out,: No such file or directory
rm: cc: No such file or directory
In full POSIX-conformance I lost my mind. Coincidentally I had an idea.
What do you think?
Index: bin/rm/rm.1
=
