On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 13:35 +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> some software needs fully functional per-thread %gs base address,
> hence the diff. limited testing shows no regressions.
> INTR_RESTORE_SELECTORS changes include:
> - %r11 is used to store curpcb instead of rdx that is used for
>wr
> some software needs fully functional per-thread %gs base address,
Which software?
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Mark Kettenis
wrote:
>> > some software needs fully functional per-thread %gs base address,
>> > hence the diff. limited testing shows no regressions.
>> > INTR_RESTORE_SELECTORS changes include:
>> > - %r11 is used to store curpcb instead of rdx that is used
> > some software needs fully functional per-thread %gs base address,
> > hence the diff. limited testing shows no regressions.
> > INTR_RESTORE_SELECTORS changes include:
> > - %r11 is used to store curpcb instead of rdx that is used for
> > wrmsr and gets trashed (it's safe to use %r11
> some software needs fully functional per-thread %gs base address,
> hence the diff. limited testing shows no regressions.
> INTR_RESTORE_SELECTORS changes include:
> - %r11 is used to store curpcb instead of rdx that is used for
> wrmsr and gets trashed (it's safe to use %r11 because it
some software needs fully functional per-thread %gs base address,
hence the diff. limited testing shows no regressions.
INTR_RESTORE_SELECTORS changes include:
- %r11 is used to store curpcb instead of rdx that is used for
wrmsr and gets trashed (it's safe to use %r11 because it's
restored
