o...@drijf.net (Otto Moerbeek), 2010.12.30 (Thu) 20:53 (CET):
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:08:33AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>
> > I consider this a bug in security(8).
> >
> > The following is the best i could come up with so far; make sure
> > to wear your sed-peril-proof sunglasses before re
Er, that would need other changes as well. Ignore me...
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:12:07PM +, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Or could use stat(1) to put the item to be sorted at the start, albeit
> ending up with a different format from ls:
>
> find -print0 | xargs -0 -r stat -f '%-40N %-10
Or could use stat(1) to put the item to be sorted at the start, albeit
ending up with a different format from ls:
find -print0 | xargs -0 -r stat -f '%-40N %-10Su %-10Sg %Sp' | sort
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 08:53:39PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:08:33AM +0100, In
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:08:33AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> I consider this a bug in security(8).
>
> The following is the best i could come up with so far; make sure
> to wear your sed-peril-proof sunglasses before reading the patch.
>
> This still mangles the file name, but at least you h
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> I consider this a bug in security(8).
>>
>> The following is the best i could come up with so far; make sure
>> to wear your sed-peril-proof sunglasses before reading the patch.
>>
>> T
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> > I consider this a bug in security(8).
>> >
>> > The following is the best i could come up with so far; make sure
>> > to wear your sed-peril-proof sunglasses before reading the pat
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > I consider this a bug in security(8).
> >
> > The following is the best i could come up with so far; make sure
> > to wear your sed-peril-proof sunglasses before reading the patch.
> >
> > This still mangles the file name, but at least yo
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> I consider this a bug in security(8).
>
> The following is the best i could come up with so far; make sure
> to wear your sed-peril-proof sunglasses before reading the patch.
>
> This still mangles the file name, but at least you have a chanc
Hello Ingo,
schwa...@usta.de (Ingo Schwarze), 2010.12.30 (Thu) 00:08 (CET):
> I consider this a bug in security(8).
>
> The following is the best i could come up with so far; make sure
> to wear your sed-peril-proof sunglasses before reading the patch.
Would have taken me ages to come up with
I consider this a bug in security(8).
The following is the best i could come up with so far; make sure
to wear your sed-peril-proof sunglasses before reading the patch.
This still mangles the file name, but at least you have a chance
to find it on your disk. Anybody has a better plan?
I already
10 matches
Mail list logo