On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 01:37:30PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 07:31:11AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 09:18:47PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > A few improvements I want to make to the sleep(1) manpage.
> > >
> > > DESCRIPTION
> > >
> > >
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 07:31:11AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 09:18:47PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > A few improvements I want to make to the sleep(1) manpage.
> >
> > DESCRIPTION
> >
> > - "for a minimum of" is better said "for at least".
> >
>
> hi.
>
> i
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 09:18:47PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> A few improvements I want to make to the sleep(1) manpage.
>
> DESCRIPTION
>
> - "for a minimum of" is better said "for at least".
>
hi.
i can;t really distinguish between one form being better than the other.
"until at least"
A few improvements I want to make to the sleep(1) manpage.
DESCRIPTION
- "for a minimum of" is better said "for at least".
- The seconds argument can be zero, so say "non-negative".
- Specify that the number (the whole thing) is decimal to exclude
e.g. hex numbers. It then follows that the
