On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:17:02AM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Edd Barrett vex...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently got caught out by scandir's quirky memory allocation. Should
we add a note so that others don't have to go through this pain too?
Could you
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:34:51PM +0100, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
- builds an array of pointers to variable-size directory entries using
malloc(3)
^ Something like this could work. Perhaps also a note that we do this because
POSIX says so.
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:33:29PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:34:51PM +0100, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
- builds an array of pointers to variable-size directory entries using
malloc(3)
^ Something like this could work. Perhaps also a note that we do this because
POSIX
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Edd Barrett vex...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently got caught out by scandir's quirky memory allocation. Should
we add a note so that others don't have to go through this pain too?
Could you elaborate on how this affected your code? I'm trying to
think of some way
