> On 10 Apr 2016, at 08:49, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>
> fair enough. but since "..." already means optional i went further and
> removed the []:
>
>filter name chain filter ...
Ack. Thanks.
David
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 08:08:21AM +0200, Joerg Jung wrote:
>
> > Am 09.04.2016 um 21:33 schrieb Jason McIntyre :
> >
> >> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 11:42:58AM +0200, david+bsd@dahlberg.cologne wrote:
> >> After quite some debugging of why the heck my smtpd.conf was not
> >>
> Am 09.04.2016 um 21:33 schrieb Jason McIntyre :
>
>> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 11:42:58AM +0200, david+bsd@dahlberg.cologne wrote:
>> After quite some debugging of why the heck my smtpd.conf was not
>> working after upgrading to 5.9 and substituting clamsmtp and dkim-
>>
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 11:42:58AM +0200, david+bsd@dahlberg.cologne wrote:
> After quite some debugging of why the heck my smtpd.conf was not
> working after upgrading to 5.9 and substituting clamsmtp and dkim-
> signer by smtpd(8) filters:
>
> smtpd.conf(5) states:
> ?? filter name chain filter
After quite some debugging of why the heck my smtpd.conf was not
working after upgrading to 5.9 and substituting clamsmtp and dkim-
signer by smtpd(8) filters:
smtpd.conf(5) states:
filter name chain filter [, ...]
but should say:
filter name chain filter [...]
Index: smtpd.conf.5