Re: snmpd(8) reduce generic errors

2020-02-14 Thread Gerhard Roth

On 2/14/20 3:42 PM, Martijn van Duren wrote:

Apparently not many people check the error count in their snmp stats.
This appears to been here since day 1.

OK?

martijn@

Index: snmpe.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/snmpd/snmpe.c,v
retrieving revision 1.60
diff -u -p -r1.60 snmpe.c
--- snmpe.c 24 Oct 2019 12:39:27 -  1.60
+++ snmpe.c 14 Feb 2020 14:41:44 -
@@ -766,6 +766,8 @@ snmpe_response(struct snmp_message *msg)
msg->sm_varbindresp = ober_unlink_elements(msg->sm_pduend);
  
  	switch (msg->sm_error) {

+   case SNMP_ERROR_NONE:
+   break;
case SNMP_ERROR_TOOBIG:
stats->snmp_intoobigs++;
break;



ok gerhard@



snmpd(8) reduce generic errors

2020-02-14 Thread Martijn van Duren
Apparently not many people check the error count in their snmp stats.
This appears to been here since day 1.

OK?

martijn@

Index: snmpe.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/snmpd/snmpe.c,v
retrieving revision 1.60
diff -u -p -r1.60 snmpe.c
--- snmpe.c 24 Oct 2019 12:39:27 -  1.60
+++ snmpe.c 14 Feb 2020 14:41:44 -
@@ -766,6 +766,8 @@ snmpe_response(struct snmp_message *msg)
msg->sm_varbindresp = ober_unlink_elements(msg->sm_pduend);
 
switch (msg->sm_error) {
+   case SNMP_ERROR_NONE:
+   break;
case SNMP_ERROR_TOOBIG:
stats->snmp_intoobigs++;
break;