I see. I guess people who really need DSA keys can figure
this out from the general format of the other sections.
Thanks for putting this into perspective.
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 14:57:54 +0100
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/06/06 23:52, bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote:
>
yeah. nuke it
On Monday, 6 June 2016, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I don't think we should be encouraging anyone to do this...ok?
>
> Index: ssl.8
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man8/ssl.8,v
> retrieving
ok!
Stuart Henderson(s...@spacehopper.org) on 2016.06.06 13:40:00 +0100:
> I don't think we should be encouraging anyone to do this...ok?
>
> Index: ssl.8
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man8/ssl.8,v
> retrieving revision 1.63
On 2016/06/06 23:52, bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote:
> Whilst not a developer per se, I don't see any reason why omitting the
> documentation for a feature that is present is a good idea, unless the
> feature is/will be removed.
The documentation is still in openssl(8).
ssl(8) is a higher-level
Whilst not a developer per se, I don't see any reason why omitting the
documentation for a feature that is present is a good idea, unless the
feature is/will be removed.
Perhaps just something like this:
Index: ssl.8
===
RCS file:
I don't think we should be encouraging anyone to do this...ok?
Index: ssl.8
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man8/ssl.8,v
retrieving revision 1.63
diff -u -p -r1.63 ssl.8
--- ssl.8 8 Feb 2016 19:29:58 - 1.63
+++ ssl.8