Re: sys/types.h in sys/socket.h

2010-11-21 Thread Philip Guenther
...and here's a diff for discussion that removes the sa_family_t and socklen_t typedefs from sys/types.h, transferring them to sys/socket.h and duping them in netinet/in.h, netinet6/in6.h, and sys/un.h as necessary. There are only two user-land fixes necessary for a build with this, in sasyncd

Re: sys/types.h in sys/socket.h

2010-11-21 Thread Ted Unangst
the sa_family_t and socklen_t typedefs from sys/types.h, transferring them to sys/socket.h and duping them in netinet/in.h, netinet6/in6.h, and sys/un.h as necessary. There are only two user-land fixes necessary for a build with this, in sasyncd and bind (the latter in the locally written privsep bits

Re: sys/types.h in sys/socket.h

2010-11-20 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote: openbsd is apparently among the last operating systems to require sys/types.h before sys/socket.h. posix doesn't require this and it runs contrary to current recommendations i think, so it's just one more weird

Re: sys/types.h in sys/socket.h

2010-11-20 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote: openbsd is apparently among the last operating systems to require sys/types.h before sys/socket.h. posix doesn't require this and it runs

Re: sys/types.h in sys/socket.h

2010-11-20 Thread Philip Guenther
sys/types.h before sys/socket.h. posix doesn't require this and it runs contrary to current recommendations i think, so it's just one more weird thing to deal with when trying to get something to compile. i haven't really tested this, i'm just throwing it out there. Sorry, but blindly