On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 10:45:14PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 10:39:21PM +0200, Remi Locherer wrote:
> > I like the feature and it works as advertised.
> >
> > It would be nice to have a column that displays the rtable id of
> > each process when T is used. When I type
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 10:39:21PM +0200, Remi Locherer wrote:
> I like the feature and it works as advertised.
>
> It would be nice to have a column that displays the rtable id of
> each process when T is used. When I type "T-0" I see a list of procs
> not in rtable 0. But I still do not know
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 05:20:56PM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> This looks good to me but I've refrained from commenting simply
> because I don't use rtables at all myself. Can we get some feedback
> from people who actually use rtables?
>
> - todd
>
I like the feature and it works as
This looks good to me but I've refrained from commenting simply
because I don't use rtables at all myself. Can we get some feedback
from people who actually use rtables?
- todd
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 09:02:14PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Sometimes I want to see processes outside the default routing table with
> `-T -0', sometimes those in in a specific one with `-T 3' (for testing).
>
> Since others have poked around with routing tables and/or domains as of
> late,
Sometimes I want to see processes outside the default routing table with
`-T -0', sometimes those in in a specific one with `-T 3' (for testing).
Since others have poked around with routing tables and/or domains as of
late, perhaps this deemed useful enough?
Semantically, filtering is identical
