On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 03:41:29PM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:35:36 -0600, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
>
> > Nope. It requires a parameter. lukem messed this up two decades ago,
> > he should have used _IO but used the wrong one.
>
> Ah right, I missed that it is _IOW. OK
>> Nope. It requires a parameter. lukem messed this up two decades ago,
>> he should have used _IO but used the wrong one.
>
>Ah right, I missed that it is _IOW. OK millert@ as-is then.
Two weeks ago, it took 2 hours for me to notice it. Annoying.
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:35:36 -0600, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> Nope. It requires a parameter. lukem messed this up two decades ago,
> he should have used _IO but used the wrong one.
Ah right, I missed that it is _IOW. OK millert@ as-is then.
- todd
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 22:48:47 +0200, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
>
> > A first stab at documenting the TIOCSTAT ioctl. The paragraph is taken
> > from termios(4) as is and could might be reworked. The parameter is as
> > stated unused but consistent with the definition of TIOCSTAT in
> > sys/sys/ttyco
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 22:48:47 +0200, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> A first stab at documenting the TIOCSTAT ioctl. The paragraph is taken
> from termios(4) as is and could might be reworked. The parameter is as
> stated unused but consistent with the definition of TIOCSTAT in
> sys/sys/ttycom.h.
I thin
Hi,
A first stab at documenting the TIOCSTAT ioctl. The paragraph is taken
from termios(4) as is and could might be reworked. The parameter is as
stated unused but consistent with the definition of TIOCSTAT in
sys/sys/ttycom.h.
Comments? OK?
Index: tty.4
==
