Re: u-boot ffs supp.

2016-07-18 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Authentication-Results: xs4all.nl; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; > dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; > d=gmail.com; s=20120113; > h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-ver

Re: u-boot ffs supp.

2016-07-18 Thread Artturi Alm
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:25:27PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:52:15 +0300 > > From: Artturi Alm > > > > iHi, > > > > optimistic as always, this would be one item off the list making me own > > this shit.:) octeon might benefit also, but haven't tested on one. > > d

Re: u-boot ffs supp.

2016-07-18 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:25:27PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:52:15 +0300 > > From: Artturi Alm > > > > iHi, > > > > optimistic as always, this would be one item off the list making me own > > this shit.:) octeon might benefit also, but haven't tested on one. > > d

Re: u-boot ffs supp.

2016-07-18 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:52:15 +0300 > From: Artturi Alm > > iHi, > > optimistic as always, this would be one item off the list making me own > this shit.:) octeon might benefit also, but haven't tested on one. > didn't figure out how to make a proper diff for ports/sysutils/u-boot/ > against

u-boot ffs supp.

2016-07-18 Thread Artturi Alm
iHi, optimistic as always, this would be one item off the list making me own this shit.:) octeon might benefit also, but haven't tested on one. didn't figure out how to make a proper diff for ports/sysutils/u-boot/ against cvs, so here is diff to be applied directly on top of recent u-boot master.