On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 12:53:45PM -0400, Dave Voutila wrote:
>
> Solène Rapenne writes:
>
> > On Fri, 2023-06-09 at 11:25 -0400, Dave Voutila wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks. This feels like bad fd accounting during the fork/exec dance.
> >>
> >> Sounds like the switch definition and usage isn't
Solène Rapenne writes:
> On Fri, 2023-06-09 at 11:25 -0400, Dave Voutila wrote:
>>
>> Thanks. This feels like bad fd accounting during the fork/exec dance.
>>
>> Sounds like the switch definition and usage isn't required for
>> reproducing?
>
> indeed, you don't need it, a local interface is
On Fri, 2023-06-09 at 11:25 -0400, Dave Voutila wrote:
>
> Thanks. This feels like bad fd accounting during the fork/exec dance.
>
> Sounds like the switch definition and usage isn't required for
> reproducing?
indeed, you don't need it, a local interface is enough
Solène Rapenne writes:
> I'm currently playing with derived qcow2 disks using vmd. While my
> setup was working on 7.3 (maybe there is an issue with MAC assignments
> in VMs) so I updated to current, but now VMs don't start at all when
> they are using a derived qcow2 disk + network interface
I'm currently playing with derived qcow2 disks using vmd. While my
setup was working on 7.3 (maybe there is an issue with MAC assignments
in VMs) so I updated to current, but now VMs don't start at all when
they are using a derived qcow2 disk + network interface
This setup works:
