On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 04:06:28PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2012/08/13 10:51, Lawrence Teo wrote:
> >
> > OK for me as well; I prefer the version that spells out the port
> > name as "sysutils/vmwh"
>
> We direct users towards packages not ports.
Good point.. thank you, I need to reme
On 2012/08/13 10:51, Lawrence Teo wrote:
>
> OK for me as well; I prefer the version that spells out the port
> name as "sysutils/vmwh"
We direct users towards packages not ports.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:07:52AM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > Hi Ted,
> >
> > Ted Unangst wrote on Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 08:57:59PM -0400:
> >
> >> The vmwh package is very handy, but somewhat hard to discover.
> >> Can we add a little hin
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> Ted Unangst wrote on Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 08:57:59PM -0400:
>
>> The vmwh package is very handy, but somewhat hard to discover.
>> Can we add a little hint to the man page for vmt?
>
> I know very little about VMWare, but from th
Hi Ted,
Ted Unangst wrote on Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 08:57:59PM -0400:
> The vmwh package is very handy, but somewhat hard to discover.
> Can we add a little hint to the man page for vmt?
I know very little about VMWare, but from the mdoc(7) perspective,
the are no issues, except that i think the i
The vmwh package is very handy, but somewhat hard to discover. Can we
add a little hint to the man page for vmt?
Index: vmt.4
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/vmt.4,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.5 vmt.4
--- vmt.4