On 2017/01/06 15:36, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> Thanks, this is very helpful. Don't mind exploring other
> routes as long as they are sustainable within OpenBSD, e.g.
> if kernel changes are needed that they are provided by the
> standard kernel eventually.
>
> > On 3 Jan 2017, at 9:44
Hi Ted,
Thanks, this is very helpful. Don't mind exploring other
routes as long as they are sustainable within OpenBSD, e.g.
if kernel changes are needed that they are provided by the
standard kernel eventually.
> On 3 Jan 2017, at 9:44 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> Timo Buhrmester wrote:
>>> del
Timo Buhrmester wrote:
> > delete [vnd] entirely
> Out of curiosity (I'm mostly a NetBSD user), without vnd what would be
> the OpenBSD-way of providing a disk-ish interface to a file?
Well, the biggest use of vnd in base was just replaced with the makefs. (from
netbsd, actually.) vnd isn't going
> delete [vnd] entirely
Out of curiosity (I'm mostly a NetBSD user), without vnd what would be
the OpenBSD-way of providing a disk-ish interface to a file?
> Franco Fichtner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is anyone aware or interested in porting vndcompress et al
> > from NetBSD to OpenBSD?
> >
> > Is there any technical reason against inclusion?
>
> well, vnd is kind of on life support. my efforts to delete it entirely have
> mostly stalled, but new featu
Franco Fichtner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone aware or interested in porting vndcompress et al
> from NetBSD to OpenBSD?
>
> Is there any technical reason against inclusion?
well, vnd is kind of on life support. my efforts to delete it entirely have
mostly stalled, but new features are probably bes
Hi,
Is anyone aware or interested in porting vndcompress et al
from NetBSD to OpenBSD?
Is there any technical reason against inclusion?
We have a budget for this. If anyone is interested please
let me know.
Cheers,
Franco