On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 09:29:16AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 04:22:43PM +0800, Michael W. Bombardieri wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 04:03:44PM +0800, Michael W. Bombardieri wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > In yacc the dup_line() function malloc()'ed a buffer and
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 04:22:43PM +0800, Michael W. Bombardieri wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 04:03:44PM +0800, Michael W. Bombardieri wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In yacc the dup_line() function malloc()'ed a buffer and copied
> > a line into it. The copied line includes \n.
> > Allocate-and-co
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 04:03:44PM +0800, Michael W. Bombardieri wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In yacc the dup_line() function malloc()'ed a buffer and copied
> a line into it. The copied line includes \n.
> Allocate-and-copy can be done by strndup() in one hit.
> I ran this on i386 with awk/awkgram.y and r
Hello,
In yacc the dup_line() function malloc()'ed a buffer and copied
a line into it. The copied line includes \n.
Allocate-and-copy can be done by strndup() in one hit.
I ran this on i386 with awk/awkgram.y and rcs/date.y and didn't
see any difference in y.tab.c compared to the system's yacc.
-
