On Tue, 3 Aug 2010, haad wrote:
Well, still no hurry, but it would be nice if some additional eyes were
pointed this way. I've got the recursive-module-load test case added
to the existing tests/modules/ stuff (and it works)!
BTW, since this is changing the kernel ABI, I guess it will need a
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Paul Goyette wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Paul Goyette wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 3 Aug 2010, matthew green wrote:
>>
>>> i think this looks good enough. wait for some others eyes, though.
>>
>> No hurry. I'm going to try to add a new atf test case for the recursive
>> l
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Paul Goyette wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010, matthew green wrote:
i think this looks good enough. wait for some others eyes, though.
No hurry. I'm going to try to add a new atf test case for the recursive load
case, and it will take some time for me to come up to speed on t
