On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:11:06 -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon t...@panix.com
wrote:
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 04:04:59PM -0400, Matthew Mondor wrote:
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 13:58:19 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon t...@panix.com wrote:
2) Finish the asymmetric operation support in cryptodev and
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 21:34:09 -0400, Michael Richardson
m...@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca wrote:
Let me ask two highlevel questions:
1) what class of systems care to enable securelevel, yet still
need to load some random set of modules after boot?
Are they x86 desktops or
On Oct 18, 2010, at 8:51 03AM, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:11:06 -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon t...@panix.com
wrote:
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 04:04:59PM -0400, Matthew Mondor wrote:
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 13:58:19 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon t...@panix.com wrote:
2) Finish
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:51:03 +0200
Jean-Yves Migeon jeanyves.mig...@free.fr wrote:
*lurker mode off*
IIRC, part of agc work with netpgp is to integrate signature verification
within kernel.
*lurker mode on*
Thanks, that's nice to know, I didn't look at netpgp yet but might
eventually check
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:31:32 -0400
Steven Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.edu wrote:
Signatures provide *authentication*; what is needed here is *authorization*.
While I agree, there also are situations were both can be welcome...
Another solution someone proposed which I like is hashing the modules
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:31:32 -0400, Steven Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.edu
wrote:
*lurker mode off*
IIRC, part of agc work with netpgp is to integrate signature
verification
within kernel.
*lurker mode on*
Signatures provide *authentication*; what is needed here is
*authorization*.
And
Casting about for current-production 10Gb adapters I could use with
NetBSD, I stumbled across the cxgb driver.
These devices are not in any of the (admittedly somewhat poorly
organized) hardware compatibility lists I can find on www.netbsd.org,
nor is there a manual page!
Does this driver work?
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Alan Barrett a...@cequrux.com wrote:
[cross-posting removed]
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010, Lourival Vieira Neto wrote:
We've created the support for scripting the NetBSD kernel with Lua,
Instead of using long long as the C data type for Lua variables, I
suggest
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Matthew Mondor
mm_li...@pulsar-zone.net wrote:
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 19:45:41 -0600
Samuel Greear l...@evilcode.net wrote:
I didn't like the fact that the only option for loading a script into
the kernel was to load the script source. I would make loading
