do we need it on HEAD, too?
Yes. The patch applies cleanly to the very recent -current.
enami.
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:23:19 +0100
Adam Hoka adam.h...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
The University of Szeged, Hungary developed a Flash and NAND subsystem for
NetBSD, which I would like to import into src. Most of the code was written
by me so direct any questions and suggestions to me. A sample
Recently, I'm receiving a lot of tech-kern mails twice, one copy (for example
the one referenced in this mal) with an additional detour to mail.bedis.eu.
Anyone else?
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Edgar_Fu=DF?= writes:
- Recently, I'm receiving a lot of tech-kern mails twice, one copy
- (for example the one referenced in this mal) with an additional
- detour to mail.bedis.eu.
- Anyone else?
Yes, on several of the lists. It looks like the address
subscribed at mail.bedis.eu
On Feb 13, 2011, at 7:30 AM, Adam Hoka wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:23:19 +0100
Adam Hoka adam.h...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
The University of Szeged, Hungary developed a Flash and NAND subsystem for
NetBSD, which I would like to import into src. Most of the code was written
by me so
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 10:44:45 -0800
Matt Thomas m...@3am-software.com wrote:
On Feb 13, 2011, at 7:30 AM, Adam Hoka wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:23:19 +0100
Adam Hoka adam.h...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
The University of Szeged, Hungary developed a Flash and NAND subsystem for
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:44:45AM -0800, Matt Thomas wrote:
consider implementing nand_crc16 via a nibble lookup table.
Is it the 'standard' crc16 (x^16 + x^15 + x^2 + 1) ?
There is a trivial xor and shift sequence for it (bytewise) that
will be faster than the byte lookup on anything that
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 01:06:36PM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
Not in the failure case I observed (I can now reproduce this, but since
it looks like the code in disklabel is going to Go,
It has Gone :-)
(The remaining question is whether to request pullup to -5; I think I
will unless
On Feb 13, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:44:45AM -0800, Matt Thomas wrote:
CountBitsInByte should be replaced by __builtin_popcount so that
machines with a popcount instruction can use it.
Which ones? There is no assembler version of popcount at
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 02:11:30PM -0800, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Feb 13, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:44:45AM -0800, Matt Thomas wrote:
CountBitsInByte should be replaced by __builtin_popcount so that
machines with a popcount instruction can use
On Feb 13, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 02:11:30PM -0800, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Feb 13, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:44:45AM -0800, Matt Thomas wrote:
CountBitsInByte should be replaced by
11 matches
Mail list logo
