Hi Joerg, hi folks,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 03:49:06PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 08:22:17PM +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 15:31:45 +, David Holland wrote:
Consequently, the changes should be reverted, at least until the
design
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 05:44:31PM +0100, Reinoud Zandijk wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 03:49:06PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 08:22:17PM +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 15:31:45 +, David Holland wrote:
Consequently, the
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 17:20:16 +
David Holland dholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote:
The other obvious approach is to add one or more new ptrace operations
to provide proper/adequate/better support for intercepting system
calls. This is probably a more useful facility in the long run, and it
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 05:20:16PM +, David Holland wrote:
The other obvious approach is to add one or more new ptrace operations
to provide proper/adequate/better support for intercepting system
calls. This is probably a more useful facility in the long run, and it
*can* be made
