On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:48:37PM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
hi,
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:00:05PM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
have you considered to separate the entity being cached from vnode?
What would this buy us ? the data are intimely tied to the inode, cleaning
the
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 01:21:33AM +, David Holland wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:28:57PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
I consider lfs second-class citizen at this time and if forward
compat if broken for the lfs module on the branch it's probably not
a big deal).
I don't
I already asked some of these questions some time ago, but got zero replies.
So I'll try to widen the audience. However, I'm not subscribed to port-i386.
I must enlarge the storage capacity of our file server.
This means updating from SCA to SAS and fron PCI-X to PCIe, so, new hardware.
The
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 08:25:04PM +0100, Edgar Fu? wrote:
My main concern is SAS. It looks like there's no support for any SAS-2
controller yet, only for the (SAS-1) LSI 1068. This sounds strange. What does
wasabi use in their storage products?
Wasabi doesn't exist.
Your best bet for a
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 03:57:28PM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 08:25:04PM +0100, Edgar Fu? wrote:
My main concern is SAS. It looks like there's no support for any SAS-2
controller yet, only for the (SAS-1) LSI 1068. This sounds strange. What
does
wasabi
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:25:06PM +, David Holland wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 07:31:17PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
So, because of modules, we can't pullup new features to netbsd-6 ?
How is this different from netbsd-5?
Modules are not used by default on netbsd-5
David Holland dholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:28:57PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
I consider lfs second-class citizen at this time and if forward
compat if broken for the lfs module on the branch it's probably not
a big deal).
I don't consider that
Wasabi doesn't exist.
???
Your best bet for a supported storage adapter might be a RAID controller
even if you don't use RAID mode.
Well, but the real RAID controllers (e.g. those supporting RAID5) seem to be
pretty exensive.
The vendors usually keep the host interface pretty stable even as the
technology on the disk
David Holland dholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:28:57PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
I consider lfs second-class citizen at this time and if forward
compat if broken for the lfs module on the branch it's probably not
a big deal).
I don't consider that
Any RAID controller where the management interface works under
NetBSD?
Well, it's old enough it's more in the nature of an existence proof by
example, but at work there's a NetBSD machine with a 3ware Escalade
12-port SATA RAID card. There's a management program that is
depressingly poorly
Is there SAS controllers out there that are not RAID?
Well, maybe some of them have RAID0 and RAID1.
I looked for one when I needed a new tape changer, and didn't find
anything with a SAS interface and no RAID (so I went fiber channel ...)
LSI SAS3xxx for SAS-1, LSI SAS 9xxx for SAS-2. See
YAMAMOTO Takashi y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp wrote:
it should retry from puffs_cookie2pnode in that case.
Here is a patch that works around the problem (I initially had printf to
check it did go through the ENOENT case and it does). I am about to
commit that and pullup to netbsd-5, except if there
hi,
YAMAMOTO Takashi y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp wrote:
it should retry from puffs_cookie2pnode in that case.
Here is a patch that works around the problem (I initially had printf to
check it did go through the ENOENT case and it does). I am about to
commit that and pullup to netbsd-5, except
14 matches
Mail list logo
