Path to kernel modules (second attempt)

2012-07-07 Thread Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
Hello, Regarding the PR/38724, I propose to change the path to /kernel/. Can we reach some consensus quickly for netbsd-6? Thanks. -- Mindaugas

Re: Path to kernel modules (second attempt)

2012-07-07 Thread Jukka Ruohonen
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 08:57:10PM +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: Regarding the PR/38724, I propose to change the path to /kernel/. Can we reach some consensus quickly for netbsd-6? I'd vote for /lib/modules noted in the PR (or maybe under /libdata?) simply because in my opinion the root

Re: Path to kernel modules (second attempt)

2012-07-07 Thread Jean-Yves Migeon
On 07.07.2012 21:57, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: Hello, Regarding the PR/38724, I propose to change the path to /kernel/. Can we reach some consensus quickly for netbsd-6? /kernel is way to close to /kern, and they serve different purposes. IMHO that will raise confusion. Technically

Re: Path to kernel modules (second attempt)

2012-07-07 Thread David Holland
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 08:57:10PM +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: Regarding the PR/38724, I propose to change the path to /kernel/. Can we reach some consensus quickly for netbsd-6? If it's going to be a new toplevel directory, it should probably be /modules. (I know there's an

Re: Path to kernel modules (second attempt)

2012-07-07 Thread Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
Jukka Ruohonen jruoho...@iki.fi wrote: On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 08:57:10PM +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: Regarding the PR/38724, I propose to change the path to /kernel/. Can we reach some consensus quickly for netbsd-6? I'd vote for /lib/modules noted in the PR (or maybe under

cache_enter test for MAKEENTRY

2012-07-07 Thread Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
Hi, I am thinking to move the test for MAKEENTRY into the cache_enter(9): http://www.netbsd.org/~rmind/cache_enter.diff Comments? -- Mindaugas

Re: Path to kernel modules (second attempt)

2012-07-07 Thread Matthew Mondor
On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 22:46:50 +0200 Jean-Yves Migeon jeanyves.mig...@free.fr wrote: On 07.07.2012 21:57, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: Hello, Regarding the PR/38724, I propose to change the path to /kernel/. Can we reach some consensus quickly for netbsd-6? /kernel is way to close to

Re: Path to kernel modules (second attempt)

2012-07-07 Thread Warner Losh
On Jul 7, 2012, at 4:17 PM, Matthew Mondor wrote: On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 22:46:50 +0200 Jean-Yves Migeon jeanyves.mig...@free.fr wrote: On 07.07.2012 21:57, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: Hello, Regarding the PR/38724, I propose to change the path to /kernel/. Can we reach some consensus

Re: Path to kernel modules (second attempt)

2012-07-07 Thread Matthew Mondor
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 20:54:12 -0600 Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote: But it kinda fails with multiple kernels. On FreeBSD, we went with /boot/$KERNNAME/kernel for the kernel, with all the modules associated with it in /boot/$KERNNAME. By default, we load /boot/kernel/kernel and the loader