dyo...@pobox.com (David Young) writes:
The MD code should pass the proper information, there is no need to fix up
the
error in the MI part.
You have a patch for that, right? Will you commit it?
I thought you wanted to try it before commiting :)
Index: x86_autoconf.c
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 04:16:38PM +, David Holland wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 04:01:47PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
I am playing with oracle XE on 6.0_RC2 and ktrace tells me that this
requires Linux aio_* system calls.
Here is the documentation:
David Holland dholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote:
Getting AIO working natively first would be a good step. :(
There is a POSIX AIO spec:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904875/basedefs/aio.h.html
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
On Oct 5, 2012, at 12:01 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Hi
I am playing with oracle XE on 6.0_RC2 and ktrace tells me that this
requires Linux aio_* system calls.
Here is the documentation:
http://lse.sourceforge.net/io/aio.html
Abd the system call man pages:
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 18:12:54 +0100
From: David Laight da...@l8s.co.uk
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 04:16:38PM +, David Holland wrote:
Getting AIO working natively first would be a good step. :(
How does Linux handle aio?
...
Some OS (noteably RSX/11M and windows) always do
Is there any advantage to using aio rather than regular I/O from threads? I$
I suspect this is mostly a question of what you're used to. I find
nothing particularly intuitive or unintuitive about either - but I went
through my larval phase on VMS, which (like the RSX/11M mentioned
upthread)
